H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Steve Johnson vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 3-0

Steve Johnson holds a 3–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2015 Washington Open first round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Steve Johnson
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Johnson #55 7-5 6-3 Lukas Lacko #117 Match data Aug 5, 2015* R64 Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Steve Johnson #48 6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 Lukas Lacko #102 Match data Jul 30, 2015* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Steve Johnson #52 6-3 6-7(5) 4-6 6-1 6-4 Lukas Lacko #94 Match data Jul 1, 2015* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Steve Johnson #1,015 #21 1,680 1,990 199 202 49.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Steve Johnson Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,529 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2012 3–5 37.5% #175 1,573 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2013 4–10 28.6% #156 1,667 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2014 20–20 50.0% #37 1,748 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2015 37–27 57.8% #32 1,950 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2016 30–28 51.7% #33 1,891 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2017 29–23 55.8% #44 1,866 0 2 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2018 27–22 55.1% #33 1,834 0 4 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2019 14–21 40.0% #85 1,736 0 4 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2020 6–8 42.9% #72 1,722 0 4 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2021 10–12 45.5% #85 1,704 0 4 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2022 17–17 50.0% #110 1,690 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2023 2–5 28.6% #241 1,571 0 4 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2024 0–1 0.0% #1017 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Steve Johnson Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2012 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2013 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 13 13 26 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2015 29 17 46 63.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 18 19 37 48.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 17 17 34 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 11 16 27 40.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 11 13 24 45.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 140 267 47.6% 34 32 66 51.5% 38 30 68 55.9% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/401 of Steve Johnson's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Steve Johnson Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2010 1/1 2.0 5.0 48.6% 70.6% 44.4% 75.0% 20.0% 57.1% 33.8% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2011 2/2 15.5 6.5 60.7% 76.6% 47.7% 71.4% 32.5% 65.2% 33.1% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2012 8/8 9.6 4.4 59.6% 74.3% 50.4% 71.8% 27.9% 64.9% 28.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2013 14/14 9.3 4.2 56.6% 71.6% 51.5% 73.4% 39.8% 62.8% 29.5% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2014 39/40 8.2 2.5 59.8% 76.6% 51.1% 61.9% 34.7% 66.5% 32.7% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2015 63/64 9.8 2.8 60.0% 75.8% 54.3% 60.7% 37.6% 67.2% 34.0% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2016 54/58 8.6 2.6 60.7% 75.7% 52.7% 60.4% 35.2% 66.8% 33.3% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2017 51/52 8.1 3.5 59.9% 76.8% 51.9% 60.9% 43.9% 66.6% 33.7% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2018 49/49 7.1 3.2 57.7% 75.3% 54.8% 72.4% 40.2% 66.6% 35.1% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2019 35/35 6.2 2.8 58.7% 73.9% 52.4% 55.0% 44.3% 65.1% 33.8% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2020 14/14 8.1 2.9 60.3% 70.3% 48.7% 64.6% 42.7% 61.7% 30.8% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2021 22/22 9.8 3.8 54.8% 74.8% 54.0% 62.6% 39.7% 65.3% 32.9% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2022 33/34 9.7 3.8 56.5% 77.3% 52.4% 64.8% 33.5% 66.5% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 7/7 7.1 3.3 60.9% 72.7% 45.4% 51.2% 36.3% 61.8% 28.6% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2024 1/1 4.0 2.0 52.4% 60.6% 46.7% 75.0% 0.0% 54.0% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 393/401 8.5 3.1 58.9% 75.4% 52.5% 63.0% 38.3% 66.0% 33.0% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Steve Johnson Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2010 1530 109.8 +0.50 -2.82 0.789 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2011 1522 113.4 -1.94 +0.90 0.951 49.0% — — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.11 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2012 1574 119.2 -0.17 -4.17 0.803 47.5% +16 — — 38.1% -0.29 1–0 2–7 (22%) — +0.64 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2013 1668 132.4 -0.53 -4.17 0.793 47.2% +9 — — 38.1% -0.62 2–4 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.27 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2014 1748 148.4 +1.33 -1.62 0.977 49.8% +26 -145 -104 47.3% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.22 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2015 1950 159.6 +2.13 -0.70 1.037 50.6% +26 -258 -270 51.9% +0.16 16–8 (67%) 14–19 (42%) — -1.02 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2016 1891 154.9 +2.76 -1.97 1.000 50.0% -21 -257 +27 52.1% +0.11 5–7 (42%) 20–15 (57%) — +0.52 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2017 1867 153.8 +2.38 -1.66 1.009 50.3% -25 -60 -12 53.8% +0.15 9–8 (53%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.43 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2018 1834 151.4 +2.39 -0.48 1.050 51.1% -64 +70 +48 55.3% +0.40 6–8 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.37 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2019 1736 133.2 +0.53 -1.35 0.971 49.8% -34 +63 +93 43.8% -0.15 3–8 (27%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.58 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1723 135.7 -1.27 -2.85 0.805 47.0% +5 — — 38.5% -0.69 4–1 (80%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.66 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2021 1705 134.5 +0.86 -2.04 0.950 49.4% +1 +76 +95 47.6% -0.08 3–4 (43%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.05 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2022 1690 133.0 +1.22 -3.58 0.925 49.2% -10 +72 +109 46.4% -0.32 5–6 (45%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.87 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1571 106.5 -1.26 -2.63 0.748 46.0% 0 — — 29.4% -1.23 1–1 1–1 — -0.02 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2024 1565 107.5 -6.04 +0.81 0.563 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1990 151.4 +1.54 -1.74 0.972 49.8% -8 -61 -5 48.7% -0.05 62–62 (50%) 114–127 (47%) 99.8 +0.22 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.