H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Steve Johnson vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 3-0
Steve Johnson holds a 3–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2015 Washington second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2015* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 7-5 6-3 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2015* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Steve Johnson | 6-3 6-7(5) 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steve Johnson | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |