H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Steven Diez vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 0-1
Thiemo de Bakker holds a 1–0 lead over Steven Diez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2014 Atlanta third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 35
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2014* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-1 6-2 | Steven Diez | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2014* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Steven Diez | 6-7(5) 2-0 (ret.) | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Diez | #940 | #134 | 418 | 1,589 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Steven Diez | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |