H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Takao Suzuki vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-0
Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2000 Tokyo second round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2000* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Takao Suzuki | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Takao Suzuki | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |