H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Takao Suzuki vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-0

Takao Suzuki holds a 1–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Takao Suzuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Takao Suzuki won the 2000 Japan Open round of 64 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Takao Suzuki #164 3-6 6-4 6-3 Kevin Kim #158 Match data Oct 11, 2000* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Takao Suzuki Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Takao Suzuki Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Takao Suzuki Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9% — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Takao Suzuki Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
18 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) 97.4 +1.98
27 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.13
28 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 97.7 +0.68
29 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.72
31 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.