H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 0-2

Filip Krajinovic holds a 2–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Croatia Open Umag first round 7-5 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Filip Krajinovic
SRB Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Filip Krajinovic #58 7-5 7-6(4) Taro Daniel #112 Match data Jul 18, 2019* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay
Filip Krajinovic #103 6-2 6-4 Taro Daniel #156 Match data Sep 25, 2014* R32 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Filip Krajinovic #1,204 #26 1,724 1,979 115 125 47.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Filip Krajinovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #352 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 3–3 50.0% #214 1,508 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #420 1,541 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #226 1,584 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #100 1,670 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2015 3–11 21.4% #101 1,674 0 0
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2016 1–5 16.7% #234 1,662 0 0
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2017 6–2 75.0% #34 1,778 0 0
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2018 14–17 45.2% #94 1,759 0 0
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2019 27–17 61.4% #40 1,900 0 0
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2020 16–12 57.1% #31 1,870 0 0
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2021 20–22 47.6% #42 1,758 0 0
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2022 17–16 51.5% #54 1,829 0 0
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 2023 3–12 20.0% #311 1,674 0 0
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Filip Krajinovic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2018 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 18 12 30 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2020 14 10 24 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 8 12 20 40.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 74 81 155 47.7% 36 38 74 48.6% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 237/240 of Filip Krajinovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Filip Krajinovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 1.0 1.0 59.0% 55.6% 36.0% 41.7% 57.1% 47.5% 43.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 3.3 2.3 61.3% 61.1% 49.0% 31.7% 25.5% 56.8% 38.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 0.3 2.0 58.3% 50.8% 36.7% 32.7% 76.7% 45.5% 36.1%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2013 1/1 6.0 1.0 57.7% 75.0% 45.5% 78.6% 50.0% 62.5% 34.0%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2014 8/8 5.3 0.9 57.1% 74.4% 55.1% 60.9% 33.8% 65.5% 34.3%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2015 14/14 4.4 3.4 60.0% 65.8% 50.6% 55.4% 36.0% 59.5% 35.0%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2016 5/6 3.2 2.2 67.4% 56.7% 41.7% 51.2% 19.7% 51.7% 33.7%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2017 7/8 7.7 2.0 66.6% 73.5% 53.0% 56.0% 64.8% 67.1% 36.1%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2018 31/31 4.5 2.2 63.1% 66.7% 52.4% 61.7% 38.0% 61.5% 38.1%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2019 44/44 5.3 1.5 65.5% 70.1% 52.7% 61.0% 46.0% 64.1% 38.7%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2020 28/28 4.3 1.7 65.0% 70.8% 51.6% 66.0% 46.3% 64.0% 40.7%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2021 41/42 4.7 2.2 62.7% 70.6% 53.1% 60.2% 44.1% 64.1% 36.7%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2022 33/33 3.7 2.1 63.7% 68.3% 53.7% 60.9% 48.5% 62.8% 35.0%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% 2023 15/15 4.5 1.5 64.9% 62.5% 50.5% 45.3% 40.5% 58.5% 31.9%
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 237/240 4.5 2.0 63.5% 68.3% 51.9% 58.7% 43.6% 62.3% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Filip Krajinovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 91.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1481 101.7 -1.43 -4.20 0.834 45.6% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1508 100.4 -1.60 +0.61 0.880 46.7% — +89 — 38.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1541 108.9 -1.83 +0.43 0.663 41.3% — +99 — 28.6% -2.43 — — — +0.34
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2013 1584 113.3 +2.82 -1.59 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2014 1671 126.4 +0.29 -1.85 0.997 50.1% -62 +55 — 52.9% +0.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2015 1675 122.4 -2.65 -0.30 0.866 47.4% -1 +17 — 27.8% -1.11 0–3 (0%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.43
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2016 1662 111.8 -3.31 -2.33 0.697 43.0% — +16 — 22.2% -2.11 1–0 — — +0.13
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 2017 1779 129.6 +1.67 +1.48 1.099 52.0% +24 — — 66.7% +0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.57
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2018 1759 156.1 -1.36 +1.87 0.990 49.7% +19 — — 48.6% +0.01 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.72
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2019 1900 160.4 +0.40 +2.33 1.077 51.3% +13 -72 — 58.5% +0.48 10–7 (59%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.80
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2020 1870 159.0 +0.84 +3.58 1.132 52.1% +27 -68 — 55.7% +0.39 3–3 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.70
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2021 1758 149.4 +0.81 +0.15 1.022 50.6% +33 +79 — 45.1% +0.05 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.69
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2022 1829 148.5 -0.77 -0.15 0.939 49.2% -61 +34 -179 47.0% -0.11 6–2 (75%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.67
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2023 1675 118.7 -3.08 -2.02 0.768 45.9% +36 +15 — 25.6% -1.72 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.87
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 2024 1640 102.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.08 -1.14 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.56 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1980 148.7 -0.39 +0.89 0.981 49.7% +11 +27 -179 47.4% -0.12 37–34 (52%) 38–53 (42%) 97.8 -1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.