H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 0-2
Filip Krajinovic holds a 2–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Krajinovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Filip Krajinovic won the 2019 Umag third round 7-5 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Filip Krajinovic | 7-5 7-6(4) | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2014* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Filip Krajinovic | 6-2 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |