H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Taro Daniel vs Guilherme Clezar.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guilherme Clezar | 7-5 6-2 | Taro Daniel | Match data | Feb 27, 2017 | Q1 | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Taro Daniel | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | Guilherme Clezar | Match data | Mar 6, 2014 | Q1 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #160 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 83 | 149 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Guilherme Clezar | #1,365 | #153 | 334 | 1,568 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #127 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #232 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #125 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #84 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 48 | 86 | 134 | 35.8% | 35 | 53 | 88 | 39.8% | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0.0% | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 12/12 of Guilherme Clezar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 75.9% | 56.1% | 46.2% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 53.7% | 20.8% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 68.4% | 51.0% | 78.6% | 66.7% | 61.4% | 34.9% |
| 21 | 2014 | 7/7 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 63.5% | 58.8% | 50.2% | 50.0% | 29.3% | 55.9% | 31.4% | 2014 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 64.7% | 67.2% | 28.1% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 53.4% | 25.7% |
| 22 | 2015 | 6/6 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 64.9% | 60.6% | 48.0% | 57.4% | 55.6% | 55.7% | 32.6% | 2015 | 3/3 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 60.5% | 63.4% | 44.9% | 49.1% | 52.9% | 56.4% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2016 | 20/23 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 64.7% | 65.6% | 51.0% | 57.1% | 44.4% | 60.3% | 38.0% | 2016 | 2/2 | 7.5 | 6.0 | 59.6% | 65.4% | 41.2% | 43.6% | 44.2% | 55.3% | 38.1% |
| 24 | 2017 | 13/13 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 64.3% | 46.2% | 60.3% | 34.9% | 57.9% | 34.8% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 52.7% | 48.3% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 33.3% | 49.1% | 25.5% |
| 25 | 2018 | 33/33 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 59.5% | 66.5% | 50.3% | 59.6% | 41.8% | 59.9% | 35.2% | 2018 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 66.6% | 70.1% | 49.1% | 53.6% | 8.8% | 62.2% | 33.8% |
| 26 | 2019 | 29/29 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 65.0% | 65.7% | 46.1% | 53.8% | 38.2% | 58.6% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 5/5 | 7.6 | 2.6 | 57.8% | 69.9% | 52.8% | 48.7% | 29.3% | 62.8% | 35.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 15/16 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 61.6% | 69.1% | 51.3% | 58.5% | 51.3% | 62.2% | 31.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 30/30 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 62.0% | 70.8% | 46.8% | 53.7% | 43.0% | 61.7% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 27/27 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 58.9% | 63.8% | 53.0% | 52.5% | 43.4% | 60.3% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 33/34 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 61.6% | 65.7% | 50.1% | 55.0% | 37.9% | 59.0% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 8/8 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 63.1% | 74.3% | 46.1% | 41.9% | 34.0% | 64.1% | 31.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 65.0% | 62.0% | 54.0% | 67.0% | 20.0% | 59.0% | 33.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 227/232 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 62.1% | 66.4% | 49.4% | 55.1% | 40.9% | 59.9% | 34.9% | — | 12/12 | 5.1 | 3.2 | 62.7% | 64.0% | 43.2% | 47.2% | 30.4% | 56.3% | 32.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1484 | 97.9 | -0.89 | -3.41 | 0.450 | 38.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1448 | 96.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1472 | 112.2 | -1.47 | -2.03 | 0.904 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.07 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1646 | 125.4 | -3.26 | -0.64 | 0.711 | 44.3% | -25 | +34 | — | 29.4% | -1.53 | 1–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.42 | 2014 | 1465 | 105.7 | -1.13 | -1.44 | 0.551 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1702 | 121.4 | -3.31 | -1.67 | 0.737 | 44.1% | -39 | +38 | — | 20.0% | -2.07 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.33 | 2015 | 1529 | 114.9 | -2.10 | -0.46 | 0.879 | 47.5% | — | +100 | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1706 | 134.6 | -2.42 | +0.61 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -27 | +26 | — | 40.0% | -0.65 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.49 | 2016 | 1514 | 110.7 | -2.12 | -1.51 | 0.853 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1653 | 118.2 | -2.87 | -0.97 | 0.828 | 46.7% | -13 | +55 | — | 40.0% | -0.98 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.44 | 2017 | 1546 | 113.6 | +0.38 | -1.49 | 0.502 | 38.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1710 | 134.1 | -3.10 | -0.06 | 0.876 | 47.9% | -54 | +87 | — | 45.8% | -0.60 | 8–4 (67%) | 12–3 (80%) | — | -0.54 | 2018 | 1540 | 113.5 | -2.17 | -0.79 | 0.895 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1656 | 126.5 | -3.85 | -0.49 | 0.872 | 47.7% | -5 | +17 | — | 36.8% | -0.90 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | +1.14 | 2019 | 1507 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1597 | 113.2 | -1.69 | -0.71 | 0.947 | 48.2% | +7 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 1608 | 121.5 | -1.63 | -2.30 | 0.831 | 47.7% | -60 | +72 | — | 36.4% | -0.64 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | +0.55 | 2021 | 1478 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1691 | 139.1 | -0.98 | -0.76 | 0.934 | 49.0% | +1 | 0 | — | 42.9% | -0.36 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | -1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1687 | 137.5 | -2.75 | +1.78 | 0.949 | 49.0% | +85 | -57 | — | 42.3% | -0.59 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 1620 | 133.6 | -3.78 | -1.95 | 0.791 | 46.0% | +58 | -15 | -129 | 31.3% | -1.25 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–10 (23%) | — | -1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1500 | 106.7 | -0.34 | -2.35 | 0.864 | 48.1% | +47 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.64 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 1535 | 107.9 | +2.05 | -1.38 | 0.805 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1816 | 134.0 | -2.66 | -0.57 | 0.871 | 47.7% | +11 | +30 | -129 | 38.4% | -0.80 | 32–44 (42%) | 43–52 (45%) | 96.1 | -0.26 | — | 1568 | 114.5 | -1.59 | -1.32 | 0.746 | 44.5% | — | +100 | — | 22.6% | -1.65 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | +4.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 28, 2023 | H2H |
| Matteo Berrettini | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 11, 2023 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 9, 2024 | H2H |
| Tallon Griekspoor | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Thiago Monteiro | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 1, 2018 | H2H |
| Guido Pella | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Marco Chiudinelli | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 31, 2016 | H2H |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 25, 2016 | H2H |