H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-0

Taro Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jack Sock
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #117 6-4 6-4 Jack Sock #23 Match data Aug 8, 2016* R64 Rio de Janeiro Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #177 #58 893 1,815 84 150 35.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,105 177 148 54.5% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel Jack Sock
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,696 0 0
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2016 36–19 65.5% #23 2,024 0 1
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,986 0 4
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,715 0 4
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,747 0 4
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2026 1–2 33.3% #177 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel Jack Sock
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 21 12 33 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 26 13 39 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 33 15 48 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 7 14 21 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2019 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2021 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 49 87 136 36.0% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 129 109 238 54.2% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 13 30 56.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 229/235 of Taro Daniel's and 322/325 of Jack Sock's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel Jack Sock
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 7.0 55.1% 63.3% 57.5% 54.5% 66.7% 60.7% 30.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 8.7 4.0 54.7% 65.2% 50.8% 31.0% 29.1% 59.4% 35.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 12/12 9.5 5.9 55.2% 71.3% 52.4% 69.4% 30.1% 63.0% 34.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/23 7.0 5.2 55.0% 75.0% 51.5% 60.4% 55.3% 64.5% 34.9%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2014 47/47 6.4 3.9 58.3% 76.5% 54.5% 68.2% 49.3% 67.5% 34.6%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2015 50/51 6.1 5.2 56.9% 75.9% 53.0% 63.5% 47.5% 66.2% 35.3%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2016 54/55 6.7 3.7 58.3% 75.8% 55.2% 67.7% 37.5% 67.2% 36.5%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2017 57/58 6.8 4.0 59.7% 72.8% 52.4% 56.9% 40.8% 64.7% 36.3%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% 2018 30/30 6.3 4.3 61.2% 73.0% 51.0% 58.6% 36.7% 64.5% 34.7%
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2019 4/4 10.8 4.5 63.0% 70.4% 49.7% 44.3% 62.5% 62.7% 28.6%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2020 7/7 5.6 4.7 60.6% 69.1% 51.8% 48.5% 45.2% 62.2% 35.7%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2021 11/11 8.5 3.8 59.3% 75.1% 47.0% 61.1% 46.0% 63.8% 36.2%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2022 17/17 6.2 3.7 64.8% 70.1% 48.6% 58.5% 40.9% 62.8% 35.7%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2023 6/6 6.0 5.5 56.9% 72.8% 47.5% 70.6% 31.7% 61.8% 33.8%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 3/4 5.7 1.3 65.0% 70.0% 56.7% 75.7% 36.0% 65.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 229/235 4.0 2.5 62.1% 66.5% 49.4% 55.3% 40.9% 60.0% 34.9% — 322/325 6.7 4.3 58.6% 74.2% 52.6% 62.1% 43.2% 65.3% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel Jack Sock
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1458 94.9 -2.51 -1.84 0.774 45.3% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.07
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1490 107.8 -1.04 +0.61 0.863 46.9% +9 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.29
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1602 120.6 -0.99 -1.79 0.926 48.9% +18 — — 43.3% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1696 140.5 +0.25 -0.25 0.983 50.1% -7 -46 — 47.2% -0.25 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 -0.01
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2014 1894 151.5 +2.13 +0.15 1.067 51.5% -36 -152 -188 56.5% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 10–11 (48%) 99.9 +0.38
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2015 1985 166.3 +2.00 +0.71 1.042 51.0% -7 -65 -218 61.0% +0.61 11–5 (69%) 16–13 (55%) 108.5 -0.24
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 +0.49 2016 2024 160.1 +2.86 +1.03 1.112 51.3% +3 -111 -222 60.1% +0.45 13–6 (68%) 17–13 (57%) 105.5 +1.63
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 +0.44 2017 1987 164.2 +1.24 +1.03 1.028 50.3% +39 -114 — 58.8% +0.23 18–9 (67%) 22–9 (71%) 108.9 +1.66
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) 112.0 -0.54 2018 1716 137.8 +0.06 -1.43 0.976 49.6% +74 +66 — 43.4% -0.47 1–13 (7%) 8–7 (53%) 84.4 +2.03
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 98.9 +1.14 2019 1634 108.9 -0.40 -1.52 0.767 45.8% +41 — — 9.1% -1.91 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.14
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2020 1726 125.6 -1.79 -0.20 0.944 48.3% -53 — — 40.9% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 +0.55 2021 1776 133.5 -0.49 -0.16 1.000 50.1% -49 — -56 53.6% +0.36 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.5 -0.96
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.6 -1.01 2022 1747 131.6 -0.95 -0.13 0.959 49.5% -34 — +59 52.3% -0.23 1–6 (14%) 5–5 (50%) 94.8 -1.19
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 99.3 -0.98 2023 1717 116.0 +0.17 -0.95 0.884 48.4% -15 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) 92.8 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2026 1537 110.8 +0.12 -1.99 0.942 49.0% — — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 133.8 -2.65 -0.58 0.872 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.6% -0.79 32–45 (42%) 45–53 (46%) 96.6 -0.21 — 2105 157.4 +1.18 +0.22 1.020 50.4% +5 -78 -125 53.7% +0.11 57–60 (49%) 90–78 (54%) 100.6 +1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.