H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taro Daniel vs John Millman H2H: 2-1

Taro Daniel holds a 2–1 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2021 Belgrade round of 16 3-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taro Daniel
Japan Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
John Millman
AUS Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Taro Daniel #104 6-2 6-3 John Millman #75 Match data Apr 10, 2022* Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Taro Daniel #126 3-6 6-2 6-3 John Millman #43 Match data Apr 23, 2021* R16 Belgrade ATP 250 Clay
John Millman #80 6-4 6-0 Taro Daniel #127 Match data Oct 5, 2019* QF Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Taro Daniel #76 6-4 7-6(7) John Millman #54 Match data Aug 21, 2018* R64 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taro Daniel #160 #58 893 1,815 83 149 35.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Millman #1,164 #33 1,530 1,902 115 145 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taro Daniel John Millman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2014 2–5 28.6% #177 1,646 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #204 1,510 0 0
22 2015 1–5 16.7% #96 1,702 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #541 1,485 0 0
23 2016 8–15 34.8% #127 1,706 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #199 1,559 0 0
24 2017 4–9 30.8% #99 1,652 0 0 2013 2–4 33.3% #190 1,651 0 0
25 2018 16–17 48.5% #77 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2019 11–18 37.9% #110 1,656 0 1 2015 5–9 35.7% #92 1,708 0 0
27 2020 1–4 20.0% #117 1,596 0 1 2016 19–21 47.5% #84 1,820 0 0
28 2021 5–11 31.2% #125 1,608 0 1 2017 3–5 37.5% #128 1,820 0 0
29 2022 12–18 40.0% #92 1,691 0 1 2018 19–19 50.0% #38 1,837 0 0
30 2023 11–16 40.7% #75 1,687 0 1 2019 20–27 42.6% #48 1,776 0 0
31 2024 10–24 29.4% #84 1,619 0 1 2020 14–13 51.9% #38 1,820 0 1
32 2025 2–6 25.0% #376 1,499 0 1 2021 22–25 46.8% #72 1,774 0 1
33 2026 0–1 0.0% #160 1,534 0 1 2022 9–17 34.6% #147 1,669 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2023 2–2 50.0% #483 1,710 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taro Daniel John Millman
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 3 5 8 37.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2018 7 11 18 38.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2015 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 15 17 32 46.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2022 10 14 24 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 2023 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 14 16 30 46.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2020 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2025 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 7 11 18 38.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 86 134 35.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 0 10 10 0.0% — 83 98 181 45.9% 19 29 48 39.6% 13 18 31 41.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 227/232 of Taro Daniel's and 256/260 of John Millman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taro Daniel John Millman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2014 7/7 1.4 2.7 63.5% 58.8% 50.2% 50.0% 29.3% 55.9% 31.4% 2010 1/1 1.0 4.0 51.9% 51.9% 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% 46.2% 30.4%
22 2015 6/6 3.5 1.8 64.9% 60.6% 48.0% 57.4% 55.6% 55.7% 32.6% 2011 1/1 4.0 3.0 76.3% 72.4% 33.3% 50.0% 66.7% 63.2% 35.3%
23 2016 20/23 3.2 2.6 64.7% 65.6% 51.0% 57.1% 44.4% 60.3% 38.0% 2012 1/1 4.0 1.0 60.9% 64.3% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 58.7% 27.8%
24 2017 13/13 3.2 3.5 65.7% 64.3% 46.2% 60.3% 34.9% 57.9% 34.8% 2013 6/6 6.2 4.2 64.0% 66.5% 49.1% 64.2% 36.7% 59.8% 38.1%
25 2018 33/33 3.4 3.7 59.5% 66.5% 50.3% 59.6% 41.8% 59.9% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 29/29 3.2 2.3 65.0% 65.7% 46.1% 53.8% 38.2% 58.6% 36.1% 2015 14/14 2.6 1.8 62.8% 71.2% 51.3% 44.5% 43.3% 63.5% 34.6%
27 2020 5/5 7.6 2.6 57.8% 69.9% 52.8% 48.7% 29.3% 62.8% 35.2% 2016 38/40 4.5 1.8 63.5% 66.4% 52.5% 49.3% 47.0% 61.4% 37.1%
28 2021 15/16 3.5 2.5 61.6% 69.1% 51.3% 58.5% 51.3% 62.2% 31.4% 2017 8/8 4.8 1.6 60.6% 63.7% 50.4% 55.2% 43.4% 58.7% 36.2%
29 2022 30/30 5.9 1.8 62.0% 70.8% 46.8% 53.7% 43.0% 61.7% 35.8% 2018 38/38 4.6 2.3 61.0% 70.3% 52.4% 60.1% 42.8% 63.0% 38.2%
30 2023 27/27 3.5 2.7 58.9% 63.8% 53.0% 52.5% 43.4% 60.3% 37.7% 2019 47/47 4.5 1.8 61.0% 68.9% 54.1% 60.1% 41.1% 63.1% 37.2%
31 2024 33/34 4.2 2.0 61.6% 65.7% 50.1% 55.0% 37.9% 59.0% 32.4% 2020 27/27 4.4 2.4 59.4% 68.8% 51.6% 60.4% 44.3% 61.9% 38.1%
32 2025 8/8 6.0 2.4 63.1% 74.3% 46.1% 41.9% 34.0% 64.1% 31.0% 2021 45/47 2.6 1.6 61.6% 67.4% 49.4% 54.0% 44.2% 60.5% 37.6%
33 2026 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.0% 62.0% 54.0% 67.0% 20.0% 59.0% 33.0% 2022 26/26 3.6 1.5 63.1% 65.1% 55.7% 51.3% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 4.3 2.3 64.9% 65.3% 45.2% 57.1% 38.7% 58.3% 33.3%
Career — 227/232 3.9 2.5 62.1% 66.4% 49.4% 55.1% 40.9% 59.9% 34.9% — 256/260 4.0 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 52.0% 55.3% 42.8% 61.8% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taro Daniel John Millman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1499 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1646 125.4 -3.26 -0.64 0.711 44.3% -25 +34 — 29.4% -1.53 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.42 2010 1510 101.6 -1.31 -0.11 0.565 38.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20
22 2015 1702 121.4 -3.31 -1.67 0.737 44.1% -39 +38 — 20.0% -2.07 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2011 1485 100.9 -0.78 -0.06 0.958 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
23 2016 1706 134.6 -2.42 +0.61 0.958 49.2% -27 +26 — 40.0% -0.65 0–6 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.49 2012 1560 110.5 -1.29 -1.40 0.673 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08
24 2017 1653 118.2 -2.87 -0.97 0.828 46.7% -13 +55 — 40.0% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2013 1651 129.6 -0.78 -0.56 0.949 49.3% -14 — — 47.1% -0.18 0–3 (0%) — — -0.22
25 2018 1710 134.1 -3.10 -0.06 0.876 47.9% -54 +87 — 45.8% -0.60 8–4 (67%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 1656 126.5 -3.85 -0.49 0.872 47.7% -5 +17 — 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.14 2015 1709 140.3 -0.75 +0.80 0.946 49.0% -23 — — 40.5% -0.32 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.67
27 2020 1597 113.2 -1.69 -0.71 0.947 48.2% +7 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.90 2016 1820 150.9 -1.72 +0.76 0.959 49.5% -29 — -82 44.2% +0.02 11–5 (69%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.72
28 2021 1608 121.5 -1.63 -2.30 0.831 47.7% -60 +72 — 36.4% -0.64 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.55 2017 1821 134.6 -0.72 +1.14 0.875 47.8% -3 — — 40.0% -0.64 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.86
29 2022 1691 139.1 -0.98 -0.76 0.934 49.0% +1 0 — 42.9% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.01 2018 1837 151.3 -0.74 +1.80 1.035 50.7% -4 -201 -51 49.5% +0.13 6–4 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -2.15
30 2023 1687 137.5 -2.75 +1.78 0.949 49.0% +85 -57 — 42.3% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.98 2019 1777 152.2 -0.76 +1.53 1.008 50.3% +15 -140 -13 48.3% +0.08 5–13 (28%) 12–16 (43%) — +0.01
31 2024 1620 133.6 -3.78 -1.95 0.791 46.0% +58 -15 -129 31.3% -1.25 3–5 (38%) 3–10 (23%) — -1.01 2020 1821 150.8 -1.03 +0.92 1.000 50.2% +33 -209 — 53.9% +0.16 5–8 (38%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.76
32 2025 1500 106.7 -0.34 -2.35 0.864 48.1% +47 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 2021 1775 134.9 -2.12 +0.76 0.952 49.1% -1 -104 -52 45.2% -0.40 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) — +1.58
33 2026 1535 107.9 +2.06 -1.39 0.805 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.10 2022 1670 130.7 -1.67 -1.79 0.878 48.1% -5 -59 +49 37.5% -0.69 3–3 (50%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1710 124.6 -0.07 -1.08 0.799 46.0% -6 — — 38.5% -0.54 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.39
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1704 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 134.0 -2.66 -0.57 0.871 47.7% +11 +30 -129 38.4% -0.80 32–44 (42%) 43–52 (45%) 96.1 -0.26 — 1902 148.8 -1.25 +0.75 0.964 49.5% -2 -141 -40 45.6% -0.16 44–50 (47%) 54–71 (43%) 96.1 -2.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.