H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taro Daniel vs John Millman H2H: 2-1
Taro Daniel holds a 2–1 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2021 Belgrade fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2022* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-2 6-3 | John Millman | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2021* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | John Millman | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2019* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | John Millman | 6-4 6-0 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2018* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-4 7-6(7) | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | John Millman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |