H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Taro Daniel vs Pedro Cachin H2H: 1-1
Taro Daniel and Pedro Cachin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pedro Cachin leads 1–0 on clay, while Taro Daniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pedro Cachin won the 2023 Gstaad third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 31
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2023* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pedro Cachin | 6-4 6-1 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2022* | Naples | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 6-4 7-6(2) | Pedro Cachin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pedro Cachin | #686 | #48 | 937 | 1,744 | 25 | 46 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taro Daniel | Pedro Cachin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #363 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #370 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #57 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #70 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #286 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |