H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Taylor Dent vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 7-5 7-6(6) 4-6 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #98 7-5 7-6(6) 4-6 6-7(3) 6-4 Taylor Dent #266 Match data Jun 24, 2009* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taylor Dent Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taylor Dent Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/292 of Taylor Dent's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taylor Dent Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taylor Dent Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 96.9 -0.36 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) 101.3 -0.88 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) 97.4 +2.03 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) 104.5 -0.53 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) 99.0 +1.76 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) 105.2 +0.10 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) 97.8 +1.07 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 97.5 -1.86 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.