H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taylor Dent vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-1

Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2008 Newport round of 32 3-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #99 3-6 7-5 6-1 Taylor Dent Match data Jul 10, 2008* R32 Newport International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taylor Dent Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taylor Dent Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0% 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/292 of Taylor Dent's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taylor Dent Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5% 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3% 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4% 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4% 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6% 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taylor Dent Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.36 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.88 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.03 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.53 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.76 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.10 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.07 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.86 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.