H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Taylor Dent vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 2-1

Taylor Dent holds a 2–1 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2009 Indianapolis round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Marcos Daniel
BRA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Daniel #75 6-2 6-4 Taylor Dent #210 Match data Jul 22, 2009* R32 Indianapolis ATP 250 Hard
Taylor Dent #235 6-2 6-1 Marcos Daniel #101 Match data Jul 9, 2009* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass
Taylor Dent #313 4-6 6-3 6-2 Marcos Daniel #110 Match data Apr 9, 2009* R32 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Marcos Daniel #904 #56 942 1,645 20 64 23.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Taylor Dent Marcos Daniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,485 0 0
24 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4 2003 1–3 25.0% #169 1,504 0 0
25 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #94 1,520 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4 2006 5–16 23.8% #165 1,445 0 0
28 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4 2007 0–2 0.0% #118 1,517 0 0
29 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4 2008 6–15 28.6% #87 1,509 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2009 6–12 33.3% #87 1,602 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2010 2–10 16.7% #96 1,498 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #904 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Taylor Dent Marcos Daniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 1 23 24 4.2% 18 35 53 34.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/292 of Taylor Dent's and 83/84 of Marcos Daniel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Taylor Dent Marcos Daniel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7% 2002 1/1 2.0 1.0 49.3% 62.2% 52.6% 81.3% 100.0% 57.3% 29.1%
24 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2% 2003 4/4 3.3 3.0 64.4% 64.1% 42.5% 61.3% 58.8% 55.9% 34.7%
25 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 2.0 4.0 59.2% 60.5% 53.6% 73.1% 31.3% 57.6% 27.0%
27 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2% 2006 21/21 3.8 1.6 65.0% 62.3% 45.2% 43.5% 49.4% 57.0% 34.8%
28 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7% 2007 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.0% 59.3% 35.3% 41.4% 0.0% 49.5% 29.6%
29 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6% 2008 20/21 4.6 1.7 60.8% 68.3% 48.5% 58.7% 29.8% 60.7% 32.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 18/18 5.4 2.9 59.6% 68.5% 50.4% 53.1% 45.6% 61.3% 30.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 12/12 5.3 2.3 59.2% 68.8% 40.5% 54.2% 48.6% 56.6% 32.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.0 1.0 63.2% 39.2% 22.9% 20.0% 25.0% 32.7% 29.7%
Career — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0% — 83/84 4.3 2.1 61.4% 65.2% 45.5% 51.9% 42.3% 57.7% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Taylor Dent Marcos Daniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.76 2002 1485 92.6 -1.32 -3.35 0.682 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
24 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.10 2003 1505 109.2 -2.90 -0.82 0.787 46.9% — — — 36.4% -0.82 0–1 1–1 — -0.36
25 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 2004 1500 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1521 115.5 +1.61 +4.56 0.637 44.2% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–2 — -0.44
27 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27 2006 1445 121.5 -3.69 -2.29 0.809 46.3% -8 +103 — 31.9% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.06
28 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.07 2007 1518 113.4 -0.91 -2.00 0.586 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
29 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.86 2008 1510 113.6 -1.79 -3.23 0.835 47.0% -113 +95 — 31.9% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1602 132.8 -1.64 -3.70 0.794 46.6% -199 +110 — 31.7% -1.20 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1499 111.5 -3.07 -3.09 0.739 45.5% -106 +119 -65 26.7% -1.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1485 99.5 -5.19 -0.62 0.441 32.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
Career — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72 — 1646 121.4 -2.49 -2.65 0.767 45.7% -111 +104 -65 29.1% -1.30 3–12 (20%) 11–11 (50%) 94.2 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.