H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 2-1
Taylor Dent holds a 2–1 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2009 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Daniel | 6-2 6-4 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2009* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Taylor Dent | 6-2 6-1 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2009* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Taylor Dent | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |