H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Taylor Dent holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2010 Stockholm third round 6-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2010* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-2 (ret.) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taylor Dent | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |