Taylor Dent
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 22, 2010 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 4, 2005 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 29, 2010 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 1 | 4 | 5 | Nov 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Robby Ginepri | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 24, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Taylor Dent vs Todd Widom H2H: 0-1
Todd Widom holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Widom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Widom won the 2009 San Jose round of 16 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Widom | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | Taylor Dent | Match data | Feb 13, 2009* | R16 | San Jose | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,910 | 152 | 140 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Todd Widom | #1,502 | #200 | 363 | 1,593 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Todd Widom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #263 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,673 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Todd Widom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 25 | 16 | 41 | 61.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 113 | 101 | 214 | 52.8% | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 29 | 23 | 52 | 55.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/292 of Taylor Dent's and 10/10 of Todd Widom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Todd Widom | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1998 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 51.6% | 71.1% | 47.8% | 52.0% | 15.8% | 60.1% | 32.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 52.4% | 58.4% | 52.8% | 38.6% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 16.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 9/10 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 55.0% | 73.1% | 47.0% | 59.7% | 32.1% | 61.8% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 22/23 | 7.2 | 5.5 | 53.3% | 77.2% | 48.9% | 52.3% | 35.8% | 63.6% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 31/37 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 59.7% | 72.5% | 53.0% | 54.4% | 47.5% | 64.5% | 38.6% | 2004 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 62.0% | 72.7% | 37.0% | 57.1% | — | 59.2% | 24.5% |
| 22 | 2003 | 39/40 | 8.5 | 6.3 | 55.1% | 78.7% | 52.1% | 64.4% | 46.6% | 66.7% | 40.0% | 2005 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 66.9% | 61.8% | 44.1% | 56.3% | 20.0% | 55.8% | 33.8% |
| 23 | 2004 | 51/57 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 59.9% | 73.2% | 49.5% | 60.1% | 47.7% | 63.7% | 37.7% | 2006 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 63.0% | 51.9% | 47.8% | 18.2% | 58.3% | 37.7% |
| 24 | 2005 | 54/54 | 8.1 | 6.6 | 54.3% | 78.7% | 49.9% | 60.4% | 40.5% | 65.7% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 5/5 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 59.6% | 76.5% | 44.0% | 50.7% | 37.9% | 63.6% | 32.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5/5 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 62.9% | 67.8% | 45.1% | 64.8% | 65.6% | 59.6% | 33.3% |
| 27 | 2008 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 60.2% | 69.7% | 44.4% | 39.8% | 51.1% | 59.6% | 35.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 27/27 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 58.3% | 77.2% | 46.3% | 56.8% | 43.8% | 64.1% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 31/31 | 7.8 | 5.9 | 56.0% | 74.5% | 46.9% | 59.1% | 42.8% | 62.3% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 277/292 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 56.6% | 75.7% | 49.5% | 58.5% | 43.1% | 64.3% | 37.0% | — | 10/10 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 62.4% | 66.2% | 45.5% | 58.9% | 40.4% | 58.5% | 33.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Taylor Dent | Todd Widom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1493 | 99.7 | -1.26 | -1.61 | 0.814 | 45.7% | +33 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.75 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 1465 | 96.9 | -3.78 | -2.62 | 0.368 | 39.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.20 | — | — | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 1529 | 121.3 | +0.19 | -0.70 | 0.847 | 47.1% | -45 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.75 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 1629 | 135.5 | +1.76 | +1.11 | 1.026 | 50.3% | -54 | — | +38 | 47.4% | -0.09 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -0.88 | 2003 | 1482 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 1689 | 132.9 | +1.18 | +0.85 | 1.087 | 51.5% | -39 | — | +71 | 56.8% | +0.38 | 3–7 (30%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +2.03 | 2004 | 1454 | 97.0 | -2.48 | +2.13 | 0.600 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | 2003 | 1889 | 141.1 | +3.77 | +2.59 | 1.202 | 53.1% | +34 | -446 | -112 | 68.5% | +0.98 | 4–3 (57%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -0.53 | 2005 | 1465 | 96.9 | -2.06 | -1.92 | 0.764 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.23 |
| 23 | 2004 | 1759 | 136.0 | +0.62 | +1.01 | 1.040 | 50.8% | +38 | -302 | +19 | 53.7% | +0.19 | 9–7 (56%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | +1.76 | 2006 | 1486 | 102.6 | -3.94 | +0.09 | 0.904 | 48.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1786 | 148.2 | +2.55 | +1.76 | 1.112 | 51.9% | +20 | — | +62 | 61.1% | +0.69 | 7–6 (54%) | 14–9 (61%) | — | +0.10 | 2007 | 1469 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 1715 | 112.2 | +0.47 | -2.19 | 0.903 | 47.7% | 0 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.55 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.05 | 2008 | 1463 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1520 | 112.8 | -0.67 | -1.24 | 0.823 | 47.8% | +67 | — | — | 53.8% | -0.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.19 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1673 | 99.9 | -1.58 | -0.41 | 0.872 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2010 | 1483 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 1731 | 134.4 | -0.29 | -1.60 | 0.968 | 49.6% | +28 | — | +79 | 45.8% | -0.22 | 4–5 (44%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 1777 | 141.2 | -0.60 | -0.78 | 0.919 | 48.7% | +7 | -290 | +11 | 42.3% | -0.45 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1911 | 143.3 | +1.28 | +0.73 | 1.037 | 50.7% | +9 | -344 | +24 | 52.8% | +0.16 | 34–46 (43%) | 71–61 (54%) | 97.1 | +0.72 | — | 1593 | 104.2 | -1.78 | -0.77 | 0.805 | 47.1% | +67 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.80 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.6 | +5.50 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Todd Widom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Ferrer | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Ivan Navarro | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 14, 2009 | H2H |
| Radek Stepanek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2009 | H2H |
| Taylor Dent | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 13, 2009 | H2H |
| Robby Ginepri | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 12, 2009 | H2H |