H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-3
Dominic Thiem holds a 3–1 lead over Taylor Fritz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2023 Munich quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2023* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-4 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-2 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4 | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |