H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Emilio Nava H2H: 3-0
Taylor Fritz holds a 3–0 lead over Emilio Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Fritz leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2025 US Open first round 7-5 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 7-5 6-2 6-3 | Emilio Nava | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2025* | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 6-4 6-4 | Emilio Nava | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2023* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Fritz | 6-4 6-1 | Emilio Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Emilio Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |