H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Taylor Fritz vs Guido Pella H2H: 2-1
Taylor Fritz holds a 2–1 lead over Guido Pella in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Fritz leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Taylor Fritz won the 2019 Eastbourne fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Taylor Fritz | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| May 14, 2019* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-4 | Guido Pella | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2017* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Guido Pella | 6-3 7-6(3) | Taylor Fritz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Fritz | #10 | #4 | 5,575 | 2,105 | 332 | 209 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Fritz | Guido Pella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #49 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #32 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #29 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #4 | 2,095 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 2,008 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–10 | 68.8% | #10 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |