H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tennys Sandgren vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 0-1

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 1–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2018 Miami Open first round 7-6(3) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tennys Sandgren
USA Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #69 7-6(3) 7-6(6) Tennys Sandgren #58 Match data Mar 23, 2018* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tennys Sandgren #1,243 #41 1,091 1,872 47 76 38.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tennys Sandgren Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2017 2–6 25.0% #96 1,498 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2018 16–20 44.4% #61 1,662 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2019 13–17 43.3% #68 1,763 0 1 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2020 8–13 38.1% #49 1,758 0 1 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2021 8–16 33.3% #96 1,686 0 1 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2022 0–3 0.0% #265 1,673 0 1 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2024 0–1 0.0% #506 1,645 0 1 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tennys Sandgren Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2018 9 10 19 47.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2022 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 47 77 39.0% 9 21 30 30.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 122/123 of Tennys Sandgren's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tennys Sandgren Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2017 8/8 4.6 1.5 62.3% 74.5% 45.2% 61.2% 33.5% 63.4% 32.4% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2018 36/36 8.3 2.5 60.9% 74.5% 49.9% 63.9% 46.0% 64.8% 34.2% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2019 30/30 9.0 2.9 60.3% 73.0% 47.9% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 35.0% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2020 21/21 11.7 3.2 62.5% 74.3% 50.1% 68.5% 35.4% 65.1% 32.4% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2021 23/24 7.8 2.7 58.7% 70.5% 45.3% 51.1% 34.4% 60.1% 32.7% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2022 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.3% 72.7% 42.1% 47.5% 10.0% 58.9% 28.8% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2024 1/1 13.0 0.0 65.8% 73.1% 40.7% 66.7% 25.0% 62.0% 29.5% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 122/123 8.6 2.7 60.6% 73.3% 48.0% 60.2% 38.0% 63.3% 33.5% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tennys Sandgren Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2009 1485 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1469 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1473 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2013 1465 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2014 1444 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2015 1428 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2016 1429 106.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2017 1499 115.3 -0.12 -0.71 0.884 47.3% -3 +27 — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 2–0 — -0.15 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2018 1663 141.8 +0.68 -1.43 0.972 49.7% +3 -100 — 44.4% -0.24 4–5 (44%) 9–14 (39%) 102.2 +0.49 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2019 1764 140.9 -0.64 -0.88 0.948 49.1% -62 — +8 47.1% -0.32 3–6 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 96.7 +0.01 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2020 1758 142.5 +1.13 -2.00 0.928 49.0% -36 -116 — 45.3% -0.20 3–7 (30%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 -0.26 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2021 1687 130.0 -1.47 -2.11 0.820 47.0% -7 -100 +53 32.7% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.96 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2022 1674 119.3 -1.51 -2.44 0.700 44.1% -10 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.51 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 2023 1634 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2024 1645 105.5 +1.35 -1.03 0.776 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.01 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1872 138.2 -0.07 -1.50 0.913 48.6% -25 -89 +27 41.1% -0.57 12–23 (34%) 30–42 (42%) 95.4 -1.94 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.