H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tennys Sandgren vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-2
Steve Johnson holds a 2–0 lead over Tennys Sandgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2020 New York third round 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3) | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2018* | Houston | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Steve Johnson | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |