H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tennys Sandgren vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 1-0
Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2019 US Open second round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tennys Sandgren | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2018 | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tennys Sandgren | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |