H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Terence Atmane vs Jordan Thompson H2H: 1-0
Terence Atmane holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Terence Atmane leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terence Atmane won the 2023 Shanghai Masters first round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 24
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2023* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Terence Atmane | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terence Atmane | #50 | #41 | 1,108 | 1,738 | 21 | 36 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terence Atmane | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #144 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |