H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Blaz Kavcic H2H: 0-1
Blaz Kavcic holds a 1–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Blaz Kavcic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Blaz Kavcic won the 2008 Poertschach third round 4-6 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Blaz Kavcic | 6-3 6-3 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
| May 21, 2008* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Blaz Kavcic | 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Blaz Kavcic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |