H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0

Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2011 Miami Open first round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #405 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Daniel Brands #177 Match data Oct 15, 2018 Q1 Q Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Daniel Brands #225 6-4 3-6 6-4 Teymuraz Gabashvili #160 Match data Feb 6, 2017 Q2 Q Sofia ATP 250 Hard
Teymuraz Gabashvili #77 6-2 7-6(5) Daniel Brands #83 Match data Mar 25, 2011* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5% 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.08 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.15 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.30 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.33 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.07 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.17 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.72 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.36 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.50 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.