H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0

Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2006 Stuttgart Open round of 64 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jiri Vanek
CZE Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #99 6-3 4-6 6-3 Jiri Vanek #111 Match data Jul 19, 2006* R64 Stuttgart Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jiri Vanek #1,543 #74 796 1,646 68 122 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Jiri Vanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #495 1,506 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0 2000 12–13 48.0% #77 1,591 0 0
23 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0 2001 11–22 33.3% #102 1,534 0 0
24 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #199 1,532 0 0
25 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0 2003 7–9 43.8% #143 1,545 0 0
26 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0 2004 4–7 36.4% #115 1,533 0 0
27 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0 2005 7–18 28.0% #99 1,500 0 0
28 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0 2006 10–17 37.0% #102 1,552 0 0
29 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0 2007 7–13 35.0% #101 1,578 0 0
30 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0 2008 7–16 30.4% #124 1,563 0 0
31 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #175 1,577 0 0
32 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Jiri Vanek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 6 7 14.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0% — 18 42 60 30.0% 48 66 114 42.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's and 180/190 of Jiri Vanek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Jiri Vanek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 2.5 2.0 43.3% 49.4% 41.6% 39.2% 61.4% 44.6% 46.6%
19 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5% 2000 22/25 6.0 3.5 55.1% 69.7% 47.3% 55.9% 43.2% 59.7% 36.5%
23 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9% 2001 29/33 5.4 2.2 54.5% 69.6% 45.8% 54.7% 42.3% 58.4% 36.3%
24 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6% 2002 5/6 5.4 1.6 56.8% 70.1% 51.4% 61.4% 54.2% 62.0% 33.9%
25 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9% 2003 16/16 7.2 2.5 56.4% 71.8% 48.8% 56.9% 51.0% 61.8% 35.2%
26 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4% 2004 11/11 5.5 3.0 57.3% 69.9% 43.5% 65.1% 34.7% 58.5% 36.3%
27 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8% 2005 25/25 7.3 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 42.7% 57.6% 34.8% 58.9% 33.4%
28 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8% 2006 27/27 4.4 3.2 65.9% 65.9% 42.1% 57.7% 46.3% 57.8% 37.9%
29 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9% 2007 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.0% 69.1% 44.6% 52.0% 44.1% 59.5% 33.2%
30 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4% 2008 21/23 6.0 3.2 58.6% 67.1% 43.2% 57.4% 44.1% 57.2% 33.6%
31 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5% 2009 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.9% 63.0% 36.1% 58.0% 25.0% 50.6% 18.6%
32 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9% — 180/190 5.8 3.0 58.6% 68.6% 44.7% 56.6% 43.0% 58.7% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Teymuraz Gabashvili Jiri Vanek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 98.4 -2.42 +0.35 0.841 45.6% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.19
19 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15 2000 1592 125.0 -1.75 -0.49 0.907 48.7% -27 +29 — 45.6% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 +0.43
23 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30 2001 1534 129.4 -2.36 -1.10 0.873 47.5% -15 +85 — 39.0% -0.76 2–7 (22%) 7–10 (41%) 94.8 -1.01
24 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33 2002 1533 112.7 +0.13 -0.05 0.893 48.7% -3 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.05
25 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07 2003 1546 123.4 -0.16 -1.98 0.920 48.6% -35 +88 — 44.7% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 104.5 -0.28
26 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17 2004 1534 107.9 -1.90 -0.97 0.873 47.3% -3 +73 — 41.4% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.51
27 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59 2005 1501 112.6 -2.39 -3.28 0.814 46.3% -3 +44 — 30.2% -1.19 5–4 (56%) 4–12 (25%) 98.4 -0.01
28 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01 2006 1552 124.5 -2.92 -0.30 0.898 48.0% -20 +4 -48 41.5% -0.51 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) 96.5 +0.18
29 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72 2007 1578 121.4 -2.67 -1.97 0.819 46.9% -83 +67 — 36.2% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 +0.50
30 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36 2008 1564 117.1 -3.67 -2.26 0.786 46.0% -66 +59 — 35.9% -1.23 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -0.23
31 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50 2009 1577 111.7 -3.01 +0.23 0.377 37.8% — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.30
32 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47 2010 1548 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06 — 1647 125.9 -2.28 -1.45 0.854 47.3% -30 +52 -48 38.7% -0.82 27–39 (41%) 41–42 (49%) 100.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.