H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2014 Barcelona second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-3 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |