H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Rik De Voest H2H: 1-0
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2008 Zagreb fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 7-5 6-1 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |