H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Teymuraz Gabashvili vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-0
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2009 Casablanca fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2009* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-4 6-4 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |