H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Attila Balazs H2H: 0-1
Attila Balazs holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Attila Balazs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Attila Balazs won the 2020 ATP Rio de Janeiro fourth round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020* | ATP Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Attila Balazs | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attila Balazs | #1,079 | #76 | 784 | 1,720 | 16 | 18 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Attila Balazs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #271 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1035 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |