H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thiago Monteiro vs Guilherme Clezar H2H: 0-1
Guilherme Clezar holds a 1–0 lead over Thiago Monteiro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guilherme Clezar leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guilherme Clezar won the 2018 Sao Paulo third round 6-3 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2018* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guilherme Clezar | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guilherme Clezar | #1,365 | #153 | 334 | 1,566 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiago Monteiro | Guilherme Clezar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #232 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |