H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thiemo de Bakker vs Jan Hajek H2H: 1-0
Thiemo de Bakker holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Hajek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2010 Rotterdam third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2013 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Jan Hajek | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Thiemo de Bakker | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jan Hajek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thiemo de Bakker | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |