H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Albert Costa H2H: 1-2

Albert Costa holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–0 on clay, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2000 Roland Garros round of 32 5-7 7-6(2) 6-1 3-6 6-4.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Costa #18 5-7 7-6(2) 6-1 3-6 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data Jun 4, 2000* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Albert Costa #27 6-1 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data Apr 22, 1998* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #25 6-4 6-3 Albert Costa #22 Match data Mar 12, 1998* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 2,004 369 265 58.2% 1 1 0 2 8 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,521 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,759 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1996 47–27 63.5% #13 1,745 0 4
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,819 0 6
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,761 0 8
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2000 29–23 55.8% #26 1,761 0 11
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,801 0 11
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,795 1 12
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,766 1 12
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,666 1 12
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,620 1 12
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,633 1 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Albert Costa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 32 19 51 62.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 15 11 26 57.7% 31 9 40 77.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 34 9 43 79.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 30 9 39 76.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 12 13 25 48.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2001 8 8 16 50.0% 17 12 29 58.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 7 11 18 38.9% 25 8 33 75.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 10 12 22 45.5%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% 102 106 208 49.0% 257 131 388 66.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 8 21 29 27.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 116/118 of Albert Costa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Albert Costa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% —/—
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% —/—
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% —/—
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% —/—
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% —/—
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% —/—
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% —/—
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% —/—
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% —/—
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% —/—
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% —/—
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2003 41/43 5.9 2.7 59.8% 70.0% 51.6% 59.1% 40.0% 62.4% 36.7%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2004 41/41 5.3 2.2 59.9% 67.9% 50.4% 51.2% 41.3% 60.9% 38.1%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2005 30/30 2.4 2.1 66.6% 65.4% 49.2% 55.5% 41.3% 59.6% 35.7%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2006 4/4 2.0 2.5 72.4% 60.5% 44.1% 40.4% 35.0% 56.2% 41.7%
Career 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% 116/634 4.7 2.4 62.0% 67.7% 50.3% 54.7% 40.6% 60.9% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Albert Costa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.13
16 1990 1480 105.3 0.0% -3.00 -0.17
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) -0.11
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) -0.26 1993 1522 107.4 +38 45.5% -0.36 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.12
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) -0.87 1994 1583 132.9 +66 40.5% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) +0.06
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) +0.15 1995 1760 146.1 -261 +67 61.1% +0.65 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) +0.33
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) -0.31 1996 1745 145.0 -165 +221 -169 58.8% +0.76 17–10 (63%) 12–19 (39%) +2.79
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) +2.31 1997 1819 155.1 -84 +151 64.4% +0.93 4–8 (33%) 10–10 (50%) -1.36
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) +0.31 1998 1762 150.6 -117 +288 60.8% +0.70 14–7 (67%) 12–5 (71%) -0.41
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) -1.78 1999 1810 148.6 -141 +220 60.4% +0.68 13–6 (68%) 15–9 (63%) -1.51
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) -1.56 2000 1761 143.3 -86 +190 53.8% +0.47 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) +0.03
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) -0.24 2001 1801 145.2 -38 +31 53.0% +0.15 7–8 (47%) 11–6 (65%) -0.92
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) +0.65 2002 1796 149.7 -97 +231 56.1% +0.31 12–6 (67%) 10–10 (50%) -0.07
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) +0.01 2003 1766 140.2 +1.04 -0.52 0.975 49.7% -38 +145 53.3% +0.12 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) +0.43
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) -2.28 2004 1666 140.3 -0.80 +0.58 0.975 49.6% +12 +168 47.6% -0.13 5–8 (38%) 7–11 (39%) +0.16
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) -0.37 2005 1621 122.1 -2.00 -1.30 0.884 48.1% +8 +73 38.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–8 (33%) +0.05
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) -0.73 2006 1633 114.2 -1.10 -0.27 0.951 48.7% +74 54.5% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.35
Career 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 2005 150.8 -0.47 -0.32 0.950 49.2% -89 +157 -169 55.7% +0.39 110–90 (55%) 109–110 (50%) 99.9 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.