H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Alex Corretja H2H: 2-3

Alex Corretja holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Indian Wells Masters final 6-4 6-4 6-3.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Alex Corretja #12 6-4 6-4 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Aug 28, 1999* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Alex Corretja #13 7-6(8) 2-6 7-6(1) Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Mar 20, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #15 7-5 6-3 Alex Corretja #4 Match data
Apr 27, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Alex Corretja #26 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Thomas Enqvist #38 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Alex Corretja #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17