H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Alexander Peya H2H: 0-1

Alexander Peya holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Peya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Peya won the 2004 US Open round of 64 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Alexander Peya
AUT Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexander Peya #130 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #59 Match data Sep 3, 2004* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Alexander Peya #1,044 #92 622 1,692 18 45 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Alexander Peya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 2001 2–2 50.0% #187 1,535 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 — — — — — — —
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 2003 1–2 33.3% #150 1,506 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 2004 4–11 26.7% #135 1,553 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2005 0–1 0.0% #298 1,529 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2006 2–4 33.3% #139 1,577 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2007 5–13 27.8% #187 1,558 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2008 3–5 37.5% #147 1,556 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2009 1–5 16.7% #269 1,628 0 0
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2010 0–1 0.0% #216 1,571 0 0
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2011 0–1 0.0% #697 1,557 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Alexander Peya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 6 15 21 28.6% 6 16 22 27.3% 3 12 15 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 62/63 of Alexander Peya's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Alexander Peya
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 2001 3/4 6.0 4.7 48.2% 76.8% 51.6% 71.7% 30.7% 63.5% 36.0%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 2003 3/3 1.7 3.7 56.1% 63.6% 40.5% 51.9% 56.7% 53.3% 36.3%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 2004 15/15 5.0 4.8 62.2% 67.7% 46.0% 59.0% 40.3% 59.3% 35.5%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 2005 1/1 10.0 2.0 62.9% 62.3% 50.0% 69.2% 40.0% 57.7% 31.6%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2006 6/6 4.0 3.8 59.7% 66.4% 53.4% 56.0% 32.1% 61.0% 36.8%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2007 18/18 4.7 3.6 62.1% 70.8% 45.1% 52.7% 35.3% 60.9% 33.2%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2008 8/8 2.8 3.5 57.4% 71.3% 44.5% 53.5% 34.7% 59.6% 34.5%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2009 6/6 4.7 2.7 60.6% 65.8% 51.9% 55.8% 36.2% 60.1% 37.8%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 65.0% 67.3% 60.7% 60.0% 44.4% 65.0% 37.2%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2011 1/1 1.0 6.0 76.7% 63.0% 39.3% 66.7% 30.0% 57.5% 35.6%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 62/63 4.4 3.9 60.4% 68.8% 47.0% 56.4% 37.2% 60.0% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Alexander Peya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 2001 1536 120.8 -0.96 -0.38 0.986 49.6% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.34
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 2002 1485 91.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 2003 1507 109.6 -0.27 -1.47 0.777 45.9% — — — 28.6% -1.28 1–0 1–0 — -0.09
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 2004 1554 111.3 -3.04 -1.50 0.871 47.7% +35 -25 +6 32.5% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.22
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2005 1529 100.2 -4.26 +1.78 0.747 46.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.09
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2006 1578 112.8 -0.38 -0.53 0.944 49.4% +16 — — 43.8% -0.75 0–2 — — +0.11
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2007 1558 123.3 -1.62 -2.20 0.851 47.6% +98 -56 -82 34.1% -0.71 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.24
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2008 1556 108.5 -1.56 -3.29 0.853 47.0% — — +79 29.4% -0.88 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.27
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2009 1628 122.4 -1.42 +0.90 0.948 48.8% — — — 33.3% -0.61 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.28
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2010 1571 104.4 +0.10 -0.53 1.064 50.0% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.02
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2011 1558 103.8 -2.06 -0.30 0.837 48.1% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1536 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1510 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1693 117.5 -1.74 -1.46 0.877 47.9% +56 -45 +1 34.6% -0.77 7–14 (33%) 5–13 (28%) 87.7 +2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.