H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Alexander Volkov H2H: 2-0
Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–0 lead over Alexander Volkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1995 Auckland semifinal 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1995* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1993* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Thomas Enqvist | 6-7(5) 6-2 7-5 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Alexander Volkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |