H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 2-1

Thomas Enqvist holds a 2–1 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anders Jarryd leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1995 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anders Jarryd
SWE Age 65 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 6-1 6-1 Anders Jarryd #64 Match data
Jun 28, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Anders Jarryd #70 1-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data
Feb 16, 1995* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #47 6-3 6-1 Anders Jarryd #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Anders Jarryd #1,316 #5 957 2,059 371 251 59.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Anders Jarryd
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1980 1–1 50.0% #182 1,515 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1981 11–12 47.8% #100 1,651 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1982 20–13 60.6% #58 1,749 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1983 35–20 63.6% #19 1,876 0 2
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1984 46–18 71.9% #6 1,989 0 4
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1985 51–20 71.8% #8 1,982 0 5
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1986 31–14 68.9% #19 1,883 0 6
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1987 39–19 67.2% #15 1,957 0 6
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1988 23–13 63.9% #32 1,820 0 6
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1989 22–15 59.5% #31 1,803 0 6
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1990 14–13 51.9% #73 1,807 0 7
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1991 26–21 55.3% #47 1,763 0 7
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1992 11–17 39.3% #150 1,593 0 7
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 1993 15–18 45.5% #67 1,624 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1994 12–12 50.0% #106 1,653 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 1995 13–17 43.3% #124 1,643 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 1996 1–8 11.1% #410 1,528 0 8