H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1992 Bolzano semifinal 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #100 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Andrei Cherkasov #29 Match data Oct 17, 1992* SF Bolzano ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% —/—
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% —/—
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% —/—
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% —/—
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% —/—
Career 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.13
16 1990 1480 105.3 0.0% -3.00 -0.17
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) -0.11 1988 1510 122.7 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 -0.18
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) -0.26 1989 1578 139.4 +40 -28 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) -0.78
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) -0.87 1990 1880 155.5 -6 -147 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) -2.83
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) +0.15 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) -1.80
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) -0.31 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) -2.86
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) +2.31 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) -1.60
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) +0.31 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) -2.62
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) -1.78 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% +65 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.10
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) -1.56 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) +0.66
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) -0.24 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) +0.31
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) +0.65 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% 14.3% -1.57 0–1 -0.13
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) +0.01 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 +0.30
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) -2.28 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 25.0% -0.88 0–1 +0.05
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) -0.37 2001 1437 97.2
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) -0.73
Career 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.