H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 0-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1993 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #26 6-2 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #86 Match data

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7