H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Andrei Pavel H2H: 4-0
Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–0 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Rotterdam third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| May 4, 2000* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomas Enqvist | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1995* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-1 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Andrei Pavel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |