H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Andrei Pavel H2H: 4-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–0 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 ABN AMRO Open round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Pavel
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #20 6-2 6-3 Andrei Pavel #25 Match data Feb 21, 2002* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #8 7-5 2-6 7-6(7) Andrei Pavel #35 Match data Aug 9, 2000* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #9 3-6 6-4 6-2 Andrei Pavel #83 Match data May 4, 2000* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #8 6-1 6-3 Andrei Pavel #243 Match data Nov 10, 1995* R16 Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Andrei Pavel #890 #13 1,550 1,897 249 252 49.7% 0 1 0 1 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Pavel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1992 0–2 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1995 2–3 40.0% #214 1,517 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1996 3–3 50.0% #135 1,553 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1997 8–16 33.3% #118 1,534 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1998 22–21 51.2% #68 1,615 0 1
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1999 28–24 53.8% #41 1,701 0 1
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2000 33–27 55.0% #27 1,781 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2001 29–26 52.7% #28 1,756 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2002 40–26 60.6% #26 1,801 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2003 8–11 42.1% #69 1,754 0 3
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2004 31–24 56.4% #18 1,767 0 3
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2005 19–25 43.2% #80 1,632 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 13–21 38.2% #113 1,583 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 12–13 48.0% #75 1,697 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1142 1,645 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 0–6 0.0% #600 1,561 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Pavel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1997 4 5 9 44.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 9 4 13 69.2% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 14 14 28 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 18 14 32 56.3% 17 9 26 65.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 17 13 30 56.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 109 112 221 49.3% 96 88 184 52.2% 21 26 47 44.7% 23 26 49 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 453/501 of Andrei Pavel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Pavel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% 1992 1/2 2.0 2.0 57.1% 67.5% 40.0% 66.7% 0.0% 55.7% 29.0%
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.8% 65.1% 51.5% 70.0% 22.2% 60.6% 29.6%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1995 3/5 3.0 2.0 63.1% 57.7% 45.2% 59.3% 57.8% 52.9% 32.0%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1996 3/6 1.0 1.3 62.1% 68.7% 50.3% 20.4% 38.4% 62.0% 37.1%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1997 22/24 3.3 2.8 61.1% 67.0% 45.0% 53.8% 46.4% 58.0% 36.2%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1998 39/43 5.2 2.2 63.7% 69.3% 49.4% 52.5% 40.8% 62.0% 39.1%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1999 47/52 3.9 2.0 67.9% 67.9% 49.3% 55.1% 39.1% 61.8% 38.6%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2000 48/60 5.6 2.5 64.4% 68.9% 53.6% 51.2% 46.9% 63.2% 39.2%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2001 49/55 4.5 2.2 64.5% 69.3% 48.8% 51.5% 49.0% 61.6% 40.9%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2002 57/66 4.6 1.9 64.6% 70.4% 52.7% 57.5% 44.1% 63.8% 41.5%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2003 18/19 5.1 2.3 62.7% 68.7% 48.1% 52.8% 36.3% 61.2% 32.0%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2004 53/55 5.7 1.8 64.0% 71.6% 52.7% 63.4% 39.6% 64.6% 37.0%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2005 44/44 7.4 1.8 64.4% 69.4% 45.9% 53.7% 39.0% 61.0% 34.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 33/34 3.5 1.8 62.9% 65.7% 49.2% 57.3% 37.7% 59.2% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 25/25 4.9 2.0 65.2% 71.2% 45.9% 54.1% 46.6% 62.5% 37.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 3.3 1.0 64.9% 63.2% 47.3% 33.3% 31.3% 56.6% 24.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 3.3 3.5 62.5% 63.5% 46.3% 40.8% 41.7% 56.2% 29.2%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 453/501 4.9 2.1 64.3% 69.0% 49.7% 54.7% 42.3% 61.9% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Andrei Pavel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1992 1483 100.6 -1.56 -0.64 0.656 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.02
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1994 1501 107.8 +3.03 -2.92 0.749 46.4% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1995 1517 112.5 +0.03 -0.76 0.679 42.8% +11 — — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.12
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1996 1554 122.2 +1.88 -0.17 0.977 48.3% — +43 — 56.3% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.06
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1997 1535 122.9 -2.36 -1.14 0.861 47.2% -5 +26 +89 40.3% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.24
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1998 1615 132.6 +0.09 +0.60 1.027 50.4% +60 -42 -66 52.9% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 9–3 (75%) — +1.70
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1999 1702 137.5 +0.71 +0.50 1.011 50.0% -5 -61 -94 52.0% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.85
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2000 1782 144.5 +1.27 +1.94 1.066 51.2% -50 -2 -106 55.4% +0.41 11–12 (48%) 11–16 (41%) — -2.01
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2001 1756 151.0 -0.25 +3.37 1.067 51.3% +45 -38 -112 54.9% +0.47 8–12 (40%) 12–17 (41%) — -1.11
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2002 1802 143.8 +1.52 +3.53 1.147 52.3% -23 +36 -142 57.1% +0.59 10–11 (48%) 13–16 (45%) — +0.89
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2003 1755 132.4 +0.24 -2.79 0.825 46.9% -7 — — 41.5% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.38
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2004 1767 147.4 +1.25 +1.53 1.046 50.9% +40 +32 -118 55.6% +0.29 10–10 (50%) 20–12 (63%) — -0.83
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2005 1632 121.9 -1.28 -2.44 0.892 48.1% -7 +125 +10 44.1% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 12–14 (46%) — +2.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1584 120.6 -2.59 -1.35 0.883 47.6% -19 +78 +51 42.5% -0.66 2–7 (22%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.09
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1697 129.0 +0.11 +0.45 1.012 50.4% -42 +17 -81 52.3% -0.09 2–8 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.88
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1646 103.9 -1.76 -2.42 0.573 41.6% -43 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1561 104.5 -2.84 -2.12 0.666 43.2% — — — 18.8% -1.94 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1898 142.6 +0.09 +0.76 0.993 49.9% +2 +18 -67 50.8% +0.06 78–97 (45%) 103–107 (49%) 95.4 -0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.