H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Andy Roddick H2H: 2-2
Thomas Enqvist and Andy Roddick are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2005 San Jose quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2004* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2003* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2001* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |