H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 2-2
Thomas Enqvist and Arnaud Boetsch are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1996 Lyon semifinal 4-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1996* | Lyon | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1995* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 7-5 6-4 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-4 6-3 6-2 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1992* | Bolzano | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 1-6 7-6(7) | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |