H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 0-1

Bjorn Phau holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bjorn Phau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bjorn Phau won the 2001 US Open round of 128 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bjorn Phau #199 6-3 4-6 6-3 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #23 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,541 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,519 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,578 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,548 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,635 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,664 0 0
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,619 0 0
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,610 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,691 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bjorn Phau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2006 10 15 25 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 56 84 140 40.0% 22 37 59 37.3% 1 13 14 7.1% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 218/218 of Bjorn Phau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bjorn Phau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% 1998 1/1 1.0 4.0 40.0% 65.0% 46.7% 50.0% 0.0% 54.0% 27.1%
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% 1999 5/5 1.6 3.4 53.4% 54.5% 54.4% 45.3% 49.6% 54.6% 40.9%
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 2000 4/4 1.8 1.8 52.8% 62.8% 40.8% 51.8% 7.1% 52.3% 31.3%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 2001 6/6 4.3 4.7 52.5% 63.3% 42.9% 53.9% 45.2% 52.9% 34.4%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 2002 7/7 3.3 3.7 50.6% 64.1% 46.5% 57.5% 53.4% 55.5% 38.5%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 2003 5/5 4.2 3.4 51.3% 66.4% 48.3% 40.4% 41.4% 57.3% 34.3%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 2004 9/9 4.9 2.9 53.1% 76.7% 51.5% 55.8% 62.4% 64.6% 43.2%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 2005 24/24 4.4 3.6 52.4% 68.8% 50.4% 55.0% 41.3% 60.2% 37.5%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2006 42/42 3.4 2.9 51.9% 68.0% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 59.6% 36.1%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2007 14/14 4.4 4.5 52.7% 66.7% 47.4% 56.2% 35.8% 57.5% 37.3%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2008 7/7 3.9 3.9 50.2% 70.9% 51.4% 56.7% 30.1% 61.5% 32.3%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2009 29/29 3.4 3.5 51.7% 69.1% 50.6% 51.6% 50.1% 60.2% 37.6%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2010 22/22 3.6 4.0 55.2% 69.2% 52.9% 65.0% 39.2% 62.1% 39.4%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2011 9/9 2.4 3.6 59.3% 63.5% 43.7% 41.9% 48.6% 55.1% 33.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 21/21 4.6 4.5 52.9% 66.9% 45.4% 55.4% 44.1% 56.9% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 2.9 2.3 53.6% 65.2% 46.5% 35.9% 31.1% 57.5% 32.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 3.0 3.2 54.6% 69.7% 55.1% 58.5% 44.1% 63.0% 39.6%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 218/218 3.7 3.5 52.8% 67.6% 49.4% 53.9% 42.5% 59.0% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bjorn Phau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1998 1489 97.1 -0.67 +0.23 0.589 40.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1999 1541 117.3 -2.26 +2.33 0.900 48.3% +18 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.05
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 2000 1520 113.1 -1.19 -2.11 0.655 41.9% — — — 10.0% -2.90 — — — -0.11
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 2001 1579 109.7 -1.56 -0.62 0.730 44.0% +30 — — 41.2% -1.53 0–2 1–0 — -0.29
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 2002 1503 105.9 -2.35 -0.97 0.866 47.0% +44 +21 — 25.0% -1.31 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 2003 1520 108.8 -1.25 -1.61 0.802 46.1% +50 — — 23.1% -1.23 1–1 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 2004 1549 112.6 +0.11 +2.06 1.218 53.5% +29 — — 54.5% +0.64 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2005 1636 123.8 -2.04 +0.30 0.941 49.1% +33 -116 -171 45.2% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.35
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2006 1534 119.1 -2.65 -1.24 0.895 47.8% +35 +14 -125 39.0% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.39
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2007 1562 125.0 -3.80 +0.33 0.876 47.5% +27 — — 35.1% -0.97 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.14
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2008 1664 123.3 +0.19 -0.03 0.839 47.4% -2 — — 38.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.93
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2009 1655 122.5 -2.48 +0.31 0.945 48.9% +37 -87 -225 39.1% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.24
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2010 1620 123.4 -0.86 +1.49 1.040 50.9% +12 +26 — 39.6% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.70
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2011 1610 120.1 -4.07 -0.27 0.753 44.3% -4 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.67
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1656 129.8 -3.82 +0.05 0.858 46.9% -5 -6 -210 36.4% -1.29 1–5 (17%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.64
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1642 127.4 -2.35 -2.12 0.765 44.5% +25 — — 26.3% -1.74 1–1 1–1 — -0.28
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1691 122.4 -0.28 +0.27 1.071 51.0% +37 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 — — +0.15
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1734 127.9 -2.24 -0.06 0.902 48.0% +26 -14 -183 38.2% -0.83 24–34 (41%) 31–41 (43%) 95.8 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.