H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 4-2

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–2 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 2004 Vienna Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Bohdan Ulihrach
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bohdan Ulihrach #104 3-6 6-4 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #58 Match data Oct 14, 2004* R32 Vienna Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #18 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 Bohdan Ulihrach #34 Match data Oct 23, 1998* R16 Ostrava ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Thomas Enqvist #25 6-2 7-6(2) Bohdan Ulihrach #33 Match data Mar 14, 1998* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #15 6-3 3-6 6-1 Bohdan Ulihrach #37 Match data Oct 2, 1997* R32 Swiss Indoors World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Bohdan Ulihrach #25 7-5 4-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data Apr 24, 1997* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #8 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 Bohdan Ulihrach #41 Match data Mar 6, 1997* R32 ABN AMRO Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Bohdan Ulihrach #805 #22 1,399 1,840 218 236 48.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bohdan Ulihrach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #472 1,491 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #142 1,475 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1995 29–20 59.2% #28 1,715 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1996 34–31 52.3% #41 1,767 0 2
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1997 26–27 49.1% #34 1,770 0 2
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1998 31–28 52.5% #33 1,757 0 3
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1999 12–22 35.3% #107 1,650 0 3
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2000 15–17 46.9% #76 1,664 0 3
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2001 34–26 56.7% #32 1,774 0 3
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2002 21–27 43.8% #75 1,683 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2003 3–6 33.3% #246 1,629 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2004 11–19 36.7% #86 1,608 0 3
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2005 1–8 11.1% #285 1,561 0 3
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2006 0–1 0.0% #349 1,558 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2007 1–2 33.3% #164 1,596 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 27 17 44 61.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1996 9 8 17 52.9% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2001 19 13 32 59.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 79 84 163 48.5% 110 102 212 51.9% 5 14 19 26.3% 24 36 60 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 409/454 of Bohdan Ulihrach's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% 1993 1/1 1.0 6.0 41.9% 65.4% 38.9% 16.7% 33.3% 50.0% 30.2%
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% 1994 1/1 1.0 0.0 42.6% 25.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 46.8% 33.3%
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1995 43/49 2.7 3.6 52.7% 67.2% 47.9% 59.0% 49.2% 58.1% 44.1%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1996 58/65 3.4 3.7 56.1% 69.1% 48.4% 54.7% 44.1% 60.0% 40.9%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1997 48/53 3.3 3.6 54.8% 71.2% 51.6% 57.3% 50.1% 62.5% 38.6%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1998 53/59 3.1 3.6 58.0% 68.4% 49.0% 55.0% 43.5% 60.1% 40.8%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1999 29/34 4.0 4.6 58.3% 68.5% 49.9% 57.9% 34.3% 60.5% 37.0%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 2000 31/32 2.7 4.0 58.5% 64.7% 46.7% 59.1% 42.1% 56.9% 40.6%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2001 53/60 3.1 3.5 57.8% 69.5% 49.5% 53.9% 43.5% 60.9% 39.7%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2002 40/48 3.5 3.1 64.0% 66.1% 49.7% 60.5% 39.8% 60.0% 36.8%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2003 9/9 3.2 2.6 64.4% 67.0% 50.0% 64.0% 30.6% 60.9% 33.9%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2004 30/30 3.1 4.0 57.4% 69.4% 48.3% 54.7% 37.4% 60.4% 34.6%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2005 9/9 1.8 3.2 65.5% 59.8% 46.0% 57.1% 27.6% 55.6% 28.3%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.9% 52.6% 40.0% 45.5% 28.6% 47.1% 44.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 12.7 8.7 60.2% 72.1% 50.5% 59.4% 22.8% 63.5% 32.7%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 409/454 3.2 3.7 57.6% 68.1% 49.0% 56.7% 42.6% 59.9% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1993 1492 103.0 -0.80 -2.87 0.604 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1994 1475 96.1 -0.13 -1.57 0.627 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.20
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1995 1715 141.9 -2.10 +3.88 1.052 50.9% -145 +66 — 58.7% +0.45 9–9 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.47
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1996 1768 146.5 -0.84 +2.63 1.024 50.5% -108 +57 -149 50.6% +0.01 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.71
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1997 1770 148.6 +0.96 +1.58 1.028 50.5% +3 -23 — 52.8% +0.24 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — -2.52
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1998 1757 145.7 -0.99 +2.84 1.022 50.3% -27 +71 — 52.0% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.52
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1999 1651 135.6 -1.17 -0.40 0.936 48.8% +16 +125 — 40.6% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.70
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2000 1665 136.1 -4.20 +2.29 0.943 48.8% -33 +149 — 47.3% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.94
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2001 1774 146.7 -0.26 +2.07 1.016 50.3% +3 +61 — 53.1% +0.08 14–7 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.57
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2002 1683 138.8 -1.87 +0.24 0.921 48.5% -8 +77 -217 45.5% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.48
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2003 1629 108.5 -1.16 -2.85 0.867 47.3% +17 — — 31.8% -1.05 1–0 0–1 — +0.30
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2004 1609 123.8 -2.09 -1.61 0.874 47.8% +63 -9 — 38.5% -0.72 1–6 (14%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.16
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2005 1561 117.4 -3.44 -1.79 0.637 42.8% +81 +5 — 15.0% -2.05 — 0–2 — -1.14
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2006 1558 99.4 +0.19 -2.67 0.845 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.10
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1597 106.2 +0.35 -3.60 0.896 48.4% — — — 38.5% -0.15 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1587 107.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1840 145.5 -1.23 +1.51 0.976 49.5% -12 +69 -188 48.5% -0.13 63–71 (47%) 58–74 (44%) 95.0 -2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.