H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Boris Becker H2H: 1-2
Boris Becker holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Boris Becker leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1996 Tour Finals round-robin match 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1996 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 7-6(1) | Boris Becker | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1996* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Boris Becker | 6-4 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1995* | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | SF | Carpet | Boris Becker | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Boris Becker | #257 | #1 | 4,297 | 2,266 | 670 | 219 | 75.4% | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Enqvist | Boris Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #6 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 65–13 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,229 | 2 | 9 |
| 19 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,040 | 2 | 12 |
| 20 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 50–9 | 84.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 2 | 19 |
| 21 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 54–8 | 87.1% | #2 | 2,232 | 4 | 24 |
| 22 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 69–14 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,206 | 4 | 29 |
| 23 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,112 | 5 | 31 |
| 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 1992 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,145 | 5 | 36 |
| 25 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 1993 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,885 | 5 | 38 |
| 26 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #3 | 2,052 | 5 | 42 |
| 27 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,043 | 5 | 44 |
| 28 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | 1996 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,083 | 6 | 49 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | 1997 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #62 | 1,914 | 6 | 49 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #69 | 1,874 | 6 | 49 |
| 31 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #131 | 1,863 | 6 | 49 |