H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Byron Black H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1999 Australian Open round of 64 7-6(6) 7-6(2) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #21 7-6(6) 7-6(2) 6-0 Byron Black #28 Match data Jan 22, 1999* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Enqvist #12 6-1 6-2 Byron Black #33 Match data Aug 7, 1996* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #9 6-2 6-1 Byron Black #23 Match data May 15, 1996* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #9 6-2 7-6(3) Byron Black #32 Match data Apr 14, 1996* F New Delhi World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Byron Black #70 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data Sep 1, 1995* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Byron Black #67 5-7 6-3 7-6(8) Thomas Enqvist #19 Match data Jun 23, 1995* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Byron Black #75 7-5 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #60 Match data Jul 23, 1994* QF Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #61 6-3 6-1 6-1 Byron Black #83 Match data Sep 5, 1993* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,873 240 230 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Byron Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,734 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,834 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1996 35–27 56.5% #44 1,746 0 1
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,723 0 1
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,737 0 1
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,710 0 2
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,636 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Byron Black
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1993 10 11 21 47.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 14 17 31 45.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 12 12 24 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1996 21 15 36 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 24 16 40 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 12 15 27 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 17 16 33 51.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 139 140 279 49.8% 12 22 34 35.3% 53 35 88 60.2% 36 33 69 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 381/470 of Byron Black's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Byron Black
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1991 4/5 3.0 2.8 56.1% 63.3% 48.1% 30.0% 32.9% 56.7% 35.5%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1992 21/28 2.4 3.0 60.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.1% 40.0% 58.9% 38.4%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1993 36/39 2.9 3.6 60.3% 64.1% 48.9% 55.0% 49.1% 57.8% 40.0%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1994 42/48 3.2 2.5 57.5% 67.6% 49.1% 56.6% 44.7% 59.6% 37.7%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1995 40/52 3.8 2.9 60.8% 70.9% 51.6% 57.0% 39.7% 63.4% 38.2%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1996 47/62 2.5 2.6 60.1% 65.3% 50.9% 57.2% 48.7% 59.4% 37.8%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 1997 41/51 4.0 3.0 57.5% 68.7% 51.7% 56.7% 44.2% 61.2% 41.1%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 1998 46/62 3.8 2.4 60.0% 68.6% 52.1% 59.0% 43.0% 62.0% 40.8%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 1999 42/47 4.9 2.3 59.3% 68.9% 51.3% 59.2% 37.1% 61.8% 38.3%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2000 40/51 3.5 1.6 62.1% 70.9% 53.0% 60.1% 42.1% 64.1% 40.4%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2001 20/21 2.2 1.7 64.3% 65.2% 51.4% 50.5% 42.5% 60.0% 34.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 2/4 3.0 1.0 66.7% 62.0% 42.4% 43.7% 55.6% 54.9% 29.3%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 381/470 3.4 2.6 60.0% 67.7% 51.0% 56.4% 43.3% 60.9% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Byron Black
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1991 1521 104.2 -1.02 -0.06 0.821 45.3% +14 — — 41.7% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — -0.22
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1992 1545 120.6 -1.55 +0.16 0.935 48.9% +19 — +38 39.1% -0.64 2–6 (25%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.55
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 1993 1663 132.7 -3.10 +1.66 0.948 49.0% -11 — -11 50.0% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.18
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 1994 1735 137.9 -1.20 +0.09 0.933 48.6% 0 — -52 44.4% -0.50 8–4 (67%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.35
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1995 1834 141.6 +1.31 +1.27 1.043 50.6% -19 -332 -108 53.3% -0.04 9–9 (50%) 17–8 (68%) — -0.98
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 1996 1747 135.8 -2.17 +0.51 0.929 48.8% +32 -274 -13 51.4% -0.06 13–5 (72%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.90
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 1997 1724 143.0 -0.46 +2.90 1.057 51.0% +19 -166 +77 51.6% +0.20 7–7 (50%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.28
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 1998 1738 141.5 +0.32 +2.69 1.074 51.1% -11 -159 +112 57.4% +0.59 10–8 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.98
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 1999 1691 138.9 -0.27 +0.43 1.001 49.9% +27 -63 +73 48.7% 0.00 7–4 (64%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.97
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2000 1711 136.3 +1.49 +2.31 1.126 52.1% -21 -150 +129 53.6% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 9–14 (39%) — +1.00
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2001 1652 123.1 -1.09 -1.12 0.873 47.9% -23 — +160 36.7% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1637 107.3 -2.90 -0.76 0.651 44.4% +5 — — 25.0% -1.50 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1873 141.2 -0.61 +1.24 0.995 49.9% +4 -184 +41 49.9% 0.00 69–57 (55%) 86–88 (49%) 103.5 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.