H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Carlos Moya H2H: 4-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–3 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2004 Athens Olympics first round 7-6(7) 6-7(8) 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Moya #4 7-6(7) 6-7(8) 9-7 Thomas Enqvist #60 Match data Aug 17, 2004* R64 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard
Carlos Moya #25 6-2 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #24 Match data May 11, 2002* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #30 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) Carlos Moya #19 Match data Oct 11, 2001* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Carlos Moya #24 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data Apr 28, 2001* SF Barcelona Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #6 6-2 2-6 6-4 Carlos Moya #57 Match data Aug 18, 2000* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #27 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Carlos Moya #8 Match data Jan 15, 1998* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #12 6-2 7-6(4) Carlos Moya #24 Match data Nov 2, 1996* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,029 554 310 64.1% 1 3 0 3 13 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,624 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,762 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,817 0 3
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,896 1 5
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,761 1 5
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,820 1 6
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,736 1 7
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,905 1 14
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 2004 56–18 75.7% #5 1,894 1 17
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,801 1 18
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,758 1 19
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 — — — — — — — 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,659 1 20

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Carlos Moya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 35 16 51 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1997 25 11 36 69.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 28 7 35 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 12 11 23 52.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2002 22 12 34 64.7% 34 7 41 82.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 20 12 32 62.5% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 23 10 33 69.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 16 10 26 61.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 12 11 23 52.2% 18 11 29 62.1% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 17 12 29 58.6% 25 10 35 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 15 12 27 55.6% 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 212 144 356 59.6% 318 135 453 70.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 16 28 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 779/864 of Carlos Moya's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Carlos Moya
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% 1995 17/18 1.7 1.1 66.9% 61.1% 56.3% 54.6% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4%
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% 1996 63/70 3.0 1.9 65.7% 68.1% 51.1% 53.5% 48.7% 62.1% 41.5%
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% 1997 67/82 3.0 2.2 62.5% 67.9% 50.2% 56.8% 51.9% 60.9% 41.3%
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% 1998 55/68 5.1 2.4 55.4% 71.4% 51.6% 58.3% 43.3% 62.3% 41.0%
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1999 53/57 5.0 3.2 53.7% 69.9% 48.7% 58.0% 38.9% 60.0% 39.8%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 2000 40/53 4.9 2.7 54.4% 73.7% 53.5% 62.4% 44.6% 64.5% 38.8%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 2001 51/57 6.2 2.2 57.0% 74.0% 54.1% 58.8% 41.4% 65.4% 38.1%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 2002 68/80 4.7 2.4 60.8% 74.9% 52.8% 60.0% 39.8% 66.2% 40.0%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 2003 67/71 6.6 3.2 55.4% 75.6% 54.5% 64.5% 44.6% 66.1% 40.9%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% 2004 69/74 7.2 2.7 56.7% 76.9% 55.9% 63.6% 42.9% 67.7% 38.3%
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% 2005 50/52 5.1 2.6 59.6% 73.3% 50.6% 61.5% 46.6% 64.0% 37.8%
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% 2006 51/52 6.2 2.5 58.5% 73.3% 50.6% 63.5% 38.4% 63.9% 36.7%
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% 2007 64/65 5.8 2.8 61.8% 73.2% 51.6% 61.5% 44.1% 64.7% 38.3%
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% 2008 51/51 5.2 2.5 61.4% 70.5% 54.8% 56.2% 38.8% 64.5% 34.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 5.2 4.5 54.2% 73.0% 51.5% 53.2% 38.4% 62.7% 32.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/8 3.6 2.1 58.8% 65.0% 47.9% 46.0% 47.9% 58.1% 32.2%
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 779/864 5.1 2.5 59.0% 72.2% 52.4% 59.6% 43.6% 63.9% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Carlos Moya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26 1995 1625 122.9 -0.16 +0.33 1.013 50.2% — +58 — 56.1% +0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.02
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87 1996 1762 150.4 +1.08 +3.10 1.096 51.9% -150 +75 — 56.1% +0.59 11–8 (58%) 15–13 (54%) — -0.34
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15 1997 1817 155.8 -0.08 +3.21 1.056 51.1% +14 +60 -246 57.5% +0.55 21–8 (72%) 12–21 (36%) — -1.62
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31 1998 1897 158.7 +0.95 +3.17 1.087 51.5% -44 +172 -324 62.1% +0.58 12–7 (63%) 18–8 (69%) — -2.63
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31 1999 1762 141.1 -1.24 +1.76 0.996 49.8% +2 +190 -151 59.5% +0.37 13–9 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.37
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31 2000 1820 146.0 +2.45 +1.57 1.095 51.8% +9 +49 -274 60.0% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 15–11 (58%) — -3.30
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78 2001 1736 146.1 +2.90 +0.43 1.100 51.5% +41 +139 -186 58.2% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.01
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2002 1971 156.2 +4.12 +2.41 1.185 52.6% -42 +39 — 66.0% +0.89 19–7 (73%) 25–11 (69%) — -1.10
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24 2003 1905 153.0 +3.88 +3.65 1.207 53.2% -13 +88 — 66.7% +1.04 13–11 (54%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.32
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65 2004 1895 151.7 +4.66 +1.24 1.186 52.7% -31 +163 -252 67.7% +0.94 18–6 (75%) 20–9 (69%) — +1.49
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01 2005 1802 145.3 +1.89 +0.56 1.050 50.9% +2 +153 — 57.6% +0.36 9–9 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.86
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28 2006 1759 140.5 +2.22 -0.58 1.018 50.4% +7 +122 — 54.9% +0.18 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.66
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37 2007 1862 154.0 +2.20 +2.02 1.085 51.5% -46 +130 — 61.4% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.30
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73 2008 1802 143.5 +1.18 -1.42 0.981 49.5% +3 +61 — 51.1% -0.01 15–8 (65%) 18–12 (60%) — +1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1716 107.3 -0.28 -2.72 0.875 48.1% +39 +108 — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1660 107.6 -1.98 -2.23 0.769 45.3% +63 +99 — 31.3% -1.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.30
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 2030 154.8 +1.99 +1.65 1.084 51.4% -14 +105 -232 59.9% +0.53 182–116 (61%) 212–160 (57%) 103.7 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.