H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Carlos Moya H2H: 4-2

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–2 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2002 Rome Masters fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Carlos Moya #25 6-2 6-1 Thomas Enqvist #24 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #30 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) Carlos Moya #19 Match data
Apr 28, 2001* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Carlos Moya #24 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #6 6-2 2-6 6-4 Carlos Moya #57 Match data
Jan 15, 1998* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #27 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Carlos Moya #8 Match data
Nov 2, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #12 6-2 7-6(4) Carlos Moya #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 — — — — — — — 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20