H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs David Prinosil H2H: 4-1

Thomas Enqvist holds a 4–1 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1999 London fourth round 6-4 7-5.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 1999* London ATP 250 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #13 6-4 7-5 David Prinosil #62 Match data
Jan 8, 1999* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #22 6-2 6-3 David Prinosil #78 Match data
Oct 30, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #17 7-5 6-1 David Prinosil #75 Match data
Feb 17, 1996* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard David Prinosil #50 6-2 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data
Apr 21, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #20 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 David Prinosil #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3