H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2000 Long Island quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 7-6(4) 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #32 Match data
Feb 15, 1997* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #10 6-4 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #110 Match data
Jan 14, 1994* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #89 6-2 3-6 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6