H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 2-2

Thomas Enqvist and Gianluca Pozzi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gianluca Pozzi leads 2–1 on carpet, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2001 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Enqvist #14 6-2 6-1 Gianluca Pozzi #59 Match data
Nov 16, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Gianluca Pozzi #45 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Nov 4, 1998* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Gianluca Pozzi #58 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #21 Match data
Oct 4, 1996* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #13 6-3 6-3 Gianluca Pozzi #129 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 172 257 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,533 0 0
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,461 0 0
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,709 0 1
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,559 0 1
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,607 0 1
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,554 0 1
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,603 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 26–22 54.2% #43 1,728 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,495 0 1