H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 5-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 5–3 lead over Goran Ivanisevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2001 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-6(1) 6-3.

SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
CRO Age 54 Left-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #126 7-6(1) 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #9 Match data
Feb 11, 2000* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Goran Ivanisevic #63 6-4 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #12 Match data
Oct 7, 1999* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Goran Ivanisevic #44 6-4 4-6 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #16 Match data
Aug 27, 1999* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #20 6-4 6-2 Goran Ivanisevic #42 Match data
Aug 14, 1995 Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 6-1 1-6 6-3 Goran Ivanisevic #7 Match data
Aug 13, 1995* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Thomas Enqvist #13 4-6 6-0 6-3 Goran Ivanisevic #7 Match data
Aug 5, 1995* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #16 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 Goran Ivanisevic #7 Match data
Jul 29, 1995* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #19 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 7-5 Goran Ivanisevic #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19
Goran Ivanisevic #395 #2 3,572 2,124 561 316 64.0% 1 2 1 0 18 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Goran Ivanisevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #371 1,488 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1989 29–23 55.8% #40 1,691 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1 1990 46–22 67.6% #9 1,921 0 1
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2 1991 35–21 62.5% #16 1,922 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2 1992 57–18 76.0% #4 2,090 0 6
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7 1993 50–21 70.4% #7 2,031 0 9
22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1994 62–26 70.5% #5 1,976 0 11
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11 1995 41–22 65.1% #10 1,911 0 12
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13 1996 76–24 76.0% #4 2,001 0 17
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1997 51–20 71.8% #15 1,866 0 20
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1998 44–28 61.1% #12 1,873 0 21
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18 1999 22–26 45.8% #62 1,713 0 21
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19 2000 11–21 34.4% #129 1,596 0 21
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19 2001 28–21 57.1% #12 1,814 1 22
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19 2002 4–7 36.4% #243 1,698 1 22
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19 2003 0–3 0.0% #657 1,646 1 22
32 2004 4–10 28.6% #266 1,632 1 22