H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Thomas Enqvist vs Horst Skoff H2H: 1-0

Thomas Enqvist holds a 1–0 lead over Horst Skoff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 1992 Adelaide International round of 16 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Horst Skoff
AUT Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Enqvist #231 6-3 1-6 6-3 Horst Skoff #33 Match data Jan 3, 1992* R16 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19
Horst Skoff #1,311 #18 1,079 1,868 208 191 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Enqvist Horst Skoff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #299 1,499 0 0
17 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0 1986 12–7 63.2% #42 1,604 0 0
18 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1 1987 20–20 50.0% #63 1,635 0 0
19 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2 1988 25–19 56.8% #45 1,776 0 2
20 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2 1989 35–22 61.4% #25 1,789 0 2
21 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7 1990 31–22 58.5% #26 1,754 0 3
22 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10 1991 34–29 54.0% #33 1,744 0 3
23 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11 1992 20–25 44.4% #92 1,666 0 3
24 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13 1993 17–18 48.6% #74 1,657 0 4
25 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16 1994 11–14 44.0% #47 1,610 0 4
26 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18 1995 2–13 13.3% #392 1,532 0 4
27 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18 — — — — — — —
28 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19 — — — — — — —
29 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19 — — — — — — —
31 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Enqvist Horst Skoff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1987 4 5 9 44.4% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 0 6 6 0.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
20 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1%
22 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 25 15 40 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 1 8 9 11.1% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
26 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3% — 23 44 67 34.3% 163 115 278 58.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's and 155/183 of Horst Skoff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Enqvist Horst Skoff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3% 1991 54/63 2.5 2.5 60.3% 67.2% 50.6% 54.8% 43.8% 60.0% 41.0%
23 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5% 1992 35/45 3.2 2.3 58.9% 65.4% 48.2% 54.2% 42.6% 58.1% 39.3%
24 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0% 1993 30/35 3.1 3.1 54.0% 68.2% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 60.1% 42.6%
25 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4% 1994 22/25 3.1 2.7 54.7% 66.0% 49.0% 51.5% 43.2% 58.4% 37.2%
26 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1% 1995 14/15 2.2 3.4 55.2% 59.3% 43.4% 58.9% 39.5% 52.6% 34.2%
27 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6% — 155/399 2.8 2.7 57.5% 66.1% 49.3% 55.0% 43.3% 58.7% 39.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Enqvist Horst Skoff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17 1985 1500 103.6 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.07
17 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11 1986 1605 126.2 — — — — -99 +79 — 61.4% +0.36 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 +1.31
18 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) 106.2 -0.26 1987 1636 132.6 — — — — -111 +62 — 47.3% -0.18 9–3 (75%) 8–5 (62%) 110.8 +0.29
19 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) 96.7 -0.87 1988 1776 144.9 — — — — -172 -12 — 51.8% +0.22 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 102.5 -1.42
20 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 105.3 +0.15 1989 1789 147.2 — — — — -77 +36 — 56.3% +0.51 10–4 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 105.4 -1.46
21 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) 111.4 -0.31 1990 1755 146.7 — — — — -30 +96 — 59.8% +0.65 12–14 (46%) 8–10 (44%) 97.1 +0.91
22 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) 98.5 +2.31 1991 1745 142.6 -0.44 +1.98 1.025 50.5% -64 +97 -227 51.9% +0.28 13–9 (59%) 9–12 (43%) 99.0 -0.59
23 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 93.3 +0.31 1992 1666 129.9 -2.26 -0.10 0.938 48.6% -94 +113 — 45.7% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +1.10
24 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) 103.2 -1.78 1993 1658 127.4 -0.67 +2.55 1.068 51.4% -125 +88 — 51.4% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.8 +0.24
25 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) 98.0 -1.56 1994 1610 124.0 -1.71 -1.57 0.894 48.2% -116 +111 — 45.5% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 +1.40
26 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) 101.6 -0.24 1995 1532 117.1 -4.63 -2.24 0.722 44.2% -38 +103 — 12.9% -2.52 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -1.07
27 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 98.6 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) 103.1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) 91.2 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) 90.3 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.8 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73 — 1868 143.4 -1.45 +0.74 0.963 49.4% -83 +73 -227 51.1% +0.08 69–52 (57%) 57–56 (50%) 103.6 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.