H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Enqvist vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-2
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2001* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 7-5 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Thomas Enqvist | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |